This guy is Dr. Ken Lunde. He's the author of two groundbreaking books on the handling of ideographic languages (e.g., Japanese and Korean) in information processing, "Understanding Japanese Information Processing" (1993) and "CJKV Information Processing" (1999 and 2008 editions). [CJKV, by the way, stands for "Chinese Japanese Korean Vietnamese"] He works for Adobe and is kind of a big deal in the global infotech scene.
In addition to his landscape-altering work in that field, he's a notable collector and photographer of fine weapons. His photographic wallpaper of pistols is extremely popular, and his extensive collection of firearms and knives is the subject of endless slavering by gun buffs.
Dr. Lunde kindly granted us this one-of-a-kind email interview where we ask about everything from firearms to "Terminator : Salvation." This is an amazing window into one of the most intense minds on the planet -- check out Dr Lunde's Web site at http://LundeStudio.com for great photos and more info, and follow him on Twitter @Ken_Lunde . So read this interview and learn how to be far more awesome than you are now.
Here's the interview, presented in its entirety :
LW) For the benefit of our readers, what is CJKV information processing?
KL) In a nutshell, it is everything about how the languages that include ideographs (aka, Chinese characters) as part of their writing system are processed on computers or by digital means. Character sets and encodings are the fundamentals, because everything else depends on those two aspects.
LW) You're known as the authority on CJKV type and computer science. What first interested you in working on CJKV information processing?
KL) My interest began in the summer 1985, when I was deciding which non Indo-Eurpean language to study as part of the graduation requirements for a degree in linguistics. My choices boiled down to Japanese and Arabic. I spent time with both languages, and chose Japanese because I found it to be more challenging. Given the events that took place in subsequent years, combined with the fact that I was in the military at the time, I am glad that I chose Japanese over Arabic. Otherwise, I might still be taking sand out of my boots.
LW) Have you lived in East Asia for an extended period of time? If so, tell us about it.
KL) I have been in East Asia only for business trips, and only once or twice for a vacation. I have not lived there for any extended period. I have been to China once, South Korea twice, and Japan several times.
LW) This kind of work seems dauntingly difficult. Did you have to attain fluency in all four languages before starting this work?
KL) Of the languages in question, I have moderate fluency only in Japanese. I studied the simplified forms as used in China, and thus have rudimentary Chinese reading ability, but I cannot understand it when spoken, and cannot pronounce its words.
LW) What are the most significant challenges you face in your CJKV work?
KL) The most difficult challenge is keeping track of changes. Then again, if things stayed the same, that would be boring and stale. How we deal with challenges define us as a person. I see challenges as opportunities.
LW) Our rough understanding is that Chinese has thousands of characters. How is this handled with respect to input devices?
KL) Fundamentally, languages are spoken. The written form is simply a way to record spoken language. For this reason, the most intuitive way to input the thousands (actually, tens of thousands) of ideographs is by reading. Of course, many ideographs share the same reading, meaning that the user must often choose among several candidates. The longer the input string, meaning words that are composed of two or more ideographs, the lower the number of candidates. Modern input methods, such as those bundled with the OSes, handle this quite well.
LW) Is your work the first of its kind?
KL) Apparently it is. My first book, "Understanding Japanese Information Processing," was published in 1993. I have been told by many people that it changed the landscape, and enabled many companies to develop software for the East Asian markets. My next two books are best thought of as expanded and revised versions of that first work.
LW) On a scale of "pretty awesome" to "inexpressibly awesome," how would you rate your job at Adobe?
KL) I don't believe in such scales, but on a scale from 0 to 10, with 10 being the highest, I would rate my job as a solid 9, and possibly a 10.
- on photography :
^^ One of Lunde's beautiful photos -- this of a customized Colt Delta Elite in 10mm
LW) Your photography is remarkable for its inviting atmosphere and warm light. How do you achieve these effects?
KL) Practice. I found that I am my best critic. I discovered several years ago that photography is all about capturing or recording light, and the better one controls the lighting, the better the results. All other factors are not nearly as critical.
LW) Were you formally trained as a photographer?
KL) No. I leaned through trial and error, and my earlier days had lots of the latter.
LW) What equipment do you use to get your results?
KL) I use a Lowel three-light set for lighting. My camera for the past 1.5 years has been a Nikon D300. My preferred lens is the Nikkor 60mm Micro lens, which I have had for over seven years, and which has transcended four digital SLR bodies. For post-processing the photos, I have been using Adobe Photoshop Lightroom (aka, Adobe Lightroom) for about three years. I used Adobe Photoshop before that.
LW) What subjects apart from weapons do you most enjoy photographing?
KL) Nature, family, and friends.
[-on firearms, etc:]
LW) Your firearms collection is very well-curated. How did you first become interested in firearms?
KL) I was raised by my father to have a strong appreciate of and respect for firearms and other weapons. I see them as specialized tools, and nothing more. I appreciate the craftsmanship that is required to make functional weapons.
LW) Does living in California present special challenges for the firearms enthusiast?
KL) Definitely.
LW) You note on your site that 10mm is one of your favorite cartridges - it's one of ours as well. Why do you favor this cartridge, and what is your preferred loading?
KL) I favor the cartridge partly due to the Glock 20 being an excellent platform for this powerful cartridge. The Glock 20 is my hunting sidearm. I do not handload 10mm, but I do handload for all of the rifle cartridges that I use. There are plenty of quality 10mm loads available today.
LW) You have some wonderful Colt Delta Elites. Have you had any reliability or durability problems with that model?
KL) I have only one Colt Delta Elite, which has been highly customized. I have not had any issue with it. Although it is significantly heavier than the Glock 20, it has more felt recoil. As much as I appreciate the Colt Delta Elite, I prefer to use the Glock 20.
LW) Which weapon in your collection would be your preferred daily carry, and why?
KL) When I am out of state, generally for hunting, I tend to carry a Glock 20. I cannot carry in California. If I could carry in California, my EDC would be a Glock 33.
LW) What are some problems you see in firearms design and how would you improve them?
KL) I am a firm believer that there is no perfect firearm. But, there is an ideal firearm, and which one it is depends on the person who needs it. To be honest, I don't see any problems in firearm design, and most of the problems that arise tend to be the result of the nonsensical firearm laws that we have, either at the State or Federal level. The ten-round magazine capacity limit is a perfect example of this.
LW) Have you trained formally with firearms? If so, where?
KL) I have had very little training with firearms, and most of it has been while in the military. Starting at an early age, like studying a foreign language, has benefits in that you develop life-long skills. And, like any sport, it is all about practice, which includes mental preparation. Some people can mentally prepare themselves on their own, and some require formal training. Still, I would like to take more formal training, when I have more free time.
LW) Some of our readers find the trigger on the original Walther P99 to be impossible to get used to, that the pull is too long and insufficiently crisp. As someone who shoots both P99s and 1911s, how do you recommend that shooters new to the P99 get acclimated to that trigger?
KL) My best advice is to dry-fire the trigger to get accustomed to it. The AS (Anti-Stress) part of the trigger is what confuses most people. Becoming accustomed to the AS trigger overcomes this issue.
LW) What are some firearms you'd like to try or acquire in the coming year?
KL) At this point, I really have nothing on the immediate radar. The Kahr P380 intrigues me, as does the new Beretta Px4 Storm Compact. (The Beretta Px4 Storm Subcompact did nothing for me, and I never developed an interest in acquiring one.)
LW) What do you look for in a handgun? In a rifle?
KL) For a handgun, I look for quality and durability. For a rifle, I look for quality and accuracy. I didn't mention accuracy for a handgun, because most have comparable accuracy, and how it fits one's hand and how well one can control the trigger are greater influences in practical accuracy.
LW) Many people ask about firearms for home defense. Some experts say that a shotgun is the most appropriate home defense weapon, while others advocate for the handgun. What in your estimation is the most suitable firearm for home defense?
KL) A typical shotgun is a bit too large (long) for home defense. If you live in an NFA-friendly state, a shotgun-based AOW would be ideal for home defense. In the end, simply having an accessible weapon is half the battle in one's ability to defend their home from intruders.
LW) Some of your firearms have beautiful aftermarket finishes. Which among these finshes do you like best?
KL) Hard chrome. In fact, that's the only aftermarket finish on any of my firearms. Everything else is factory-applied.
LW) What is it about Del Fatti holsters that you like so well?
KL) The workmanship and attention to detail. I specifically like his ISP-SS holster with the Slotted Pad belt attachment. The holster is no bigger than it needs to be, and the Slotted Pad belt attachment protrudes very little.
LW) You also have many Busse knives. What attracts you to those items?
KL) I am attracted to Busse Combat knives due to their hard-use nature, and the fact that they hold an edge for a long time. Busse Combat also stands behind their knives. I also like other brands, such as Randall Made, Scott Cook, Chris Reeve, and others.
[- on hunting]
LW) What game do you enjoy hunting?
KL) I hunt prairie dogs with my dad, who is 74, in Spring or Summer, sometimes both. I hunt pronghorn antelope in Fall. I am interested in both because the shooting distances are generally long, usually 250 yards are further. Pronghorn antelope are also North America's fastest land mammal, so there is inherent challenge in hunting them.
LW) Where are some of your favorite locations to hunt?
KL) Wyoming and South Dakota.
LW) What arms and cartridges do you prefer to use while hunting?
KL) I favor .204 Ruger for prairie dogs, and have been using 6.5x55 SE for pronghorn antelope for the past four years. The rifles that I use are made by Cooper Arms, which is located in Montana.
[- on the arts]
LW) What music (genres / artists) do you like to listen to? What exactly is it about that music that resonates with you?
KL) I would have to say that my favorite artists are Tangerine Dream, Rush, and TCM.
LW) What visual art do you like?
KL) Photography.
LW) What are some of your favorite movies?
KL) I very much enjoyed "Avatar" and the new "Star Trek." Both resonated with me extraordinarily well.
LW) What foods do you enjoy? Do you prefer to cook at home or eat at restaurants?
KL) I like pastas, pizza, anything on the grill, and salads. We eat out very little, and do most of our cooking at home.
LW) What was the last book you read? Did you like it?
KL) I don't read much in terms of books or novels. Most of what I read tends to be reference manuals, where I read specific pages or chapters. I would say that I do more writing than reading. (In retrospect, I probably should have learned how to type.)
LW) Did you see "Terminator : Salvation?" Did you think it rocked?
KL) I enjoyed that movie, and while I thought it added to the "Terminator" story line, I felt that "Avatar" rocked much more.
[- Other topics :]
LW) What's your favorite comic strip?
KL) I really don't have any.
LW) What fiscal and monetary policies do you favor with regard to the USA?
KL) No comment.
LW) Do you believe that computer programming is an essential skill for all knowledge workers?
KL) Computer programming is skill for those who develop software. Most people wouldn't benefit from this, unless they need this skill, and can practice it. The ability to use a simpler scripting language can benefit a broader range of people.
LW) Do you have a garden /.grow your own food?
KL) Yes.
LW) What is the matter with kids these days?
KL) Of course, it depends on the kids. For those with issues, I am sure it is related to how their parents raised them. Instilling respect would go a long way to raising kids better.
LW) How should the balance between freedom and security be handled with respect to US domestic policy?
KL) No comment.
LW) What's the most effective pickup line?
KL) No comment.
LW) What do you think about the recent move to deep-six the NASA moon mission and greatly scale back public space exploration?
KL) Say, maybe it is NASA's way to acknowledge that we have been contacted by extraterrestrial life.
LW) In your opinion, does time exist as a fundamental feature of our universe, or is its apparently unstoppable arrow merely an artifact of consciousness? What is the nature of time?
KL) Time is clearly a constant and does not stop, but the nature of our existence makes its flow seem relative. And, our ability to preserve memories allows us to transcend the flow of time, relative to events that have already taken place.
LW) Do you believe reality is fundamentally deterministic or indeterminate / stochastic?
KL) Our reality is based on our perception of the universe, which is based on principles and rules. So, I would vote for the former.
LW) Do you play any musical instruments?
KL) I played percussion in high school. That's about it. I prefer to appreciate music, not create it.
LW) Do you think that the present educational system in the US is adequate?
KL) No educational system is adequate.
LW) Can folks contact you on Twitter? If so, what's your Twitter name?
KL) Of course. My Twitter name is ken_lunde. I am also on Facebook.
LW) Do you believe that humans will continue to exist after the Earth and our Sun are gone in a few billion years?
KL) Given our tendency toward self-destruction, probably not. Interestingly, I believe that humans and other life on this planet were engineered. In other words, something created us.
LW) Thanks very much for taking the time to answer some of our questions.
Latewire was represented at the 2009 NRA show in Phoenix, Arizona. Crowds for the convention where incredible, and getting heavier long before the heavy hitting speakers and authors where due to show. This author was there for one reason only, to see the manufacturer's displays and was not disappointed. So here is a brief list of what caught my eye (not necessarily new for the year):
Ruger - The biggest news is the launch of their entry into the AR market, the SR-556. Whoopty do. It appears to be a quality product, but there are already many makers of quality ARs especially for the whopping $2000 MSRP. Why not get the Mini series to not take proprietary magazines or restart the XGI (.308 Mini) program? For those of you keeping score, that brings the number of established manufactures releasing a AR line for the last two years up to six.
EAA - Gun bunnies! How best to sell a bunch of Italian value line pistols and rifles? Why with models in t-shits and short shorts! I wouldn't have noticed their newish AK offering otherwise.
Sig Sauer - The entry of their Sig 556 rifle was a bit rough to say the least. It would appear from the models on display that a good number of issues where addressed and ironed out. Here's hoping they put a dent in the AR clone market.
Mossberg - Mossberg enters the semi-auto shotgun market with the 930, and I am very impressed as it had a decent trigger pull and quality optics.
Bushmaster - Bushmaster releases a .50BMG... it's for plinking, right?
FN - The big thing out this year is their fantastic FN SCAR. Having played around with one, I'll give mad props to FN for bringing a new and quality product to the market.
HK - HK had their full stable of small arms including their MP5 (stock,navy, and suppressed), PDW, UMP, and G36. Not that those where terribly new but they were fun to see.
CZ - New polymer wonder nine this year! (Author goes cross-eyed.) In news that does not induce product-glut brain damage; CZ is trying to move their new manufacture Vz-58 as a competitor to the AK design. Good luck to them, but their price point at $950 seems a bit high.
Patriot Ordnance Factory - How do you stand out as one of the thousand AR manufactures? With eXtreme displays. Seriously, they had carbines mock-ups mounted machinegun on a Hummer with full 411 eXtreme videos and literature. Easily the winner of the eXtreme marketing department. POF has brought a good number of products to the market that this author approves of, but come just because your major buyers are keyboard kommandos doesn't mean that you can't pretend to have some degree of decorum.
MIA: Kel-Tec - Kel-Tec didn't make the show, which is a shame as I was very much looking forward to fondling an RFB.
All in all the show was a blast, while I don't think that the NRA is the most competent of firearm advocacy groups, they are far away the largest. The one thing that I find bothersome about what's new is the standardization of firearm patterns, if trends continue there will be only 1911s, glock clones, and ARs. (39,334)
As Bill's fine article below suggests, those of us living in the United States and Canada are fortunate enough -- at least for now -- to have the legal privilege to own and use firearms. Guns are owned for a variety of perfectly reasonable purposes : for sport and subsistence hunting, for recreational and target shooting, for their historical and aesthetic collectibility, for home and personal defense. Like other hobbies, firearms collecting and use provides the enthusiast with fodder for interminable technical conversation and comparison of one's aptitude with that of other fanatics. And, unlike golf, shooting can give you skills that'll be useful when the revolution comes. 'Sideways'-style goon-repellent tactics aside, it's pretty tough to defend your homestead with a five-wood.
There is, however, a problem. A combination of influence from movies and video games, deep-rooted fears, and the real destructive power of guns often leads the enthusiast to increasingly seek out and admire weapons designed for what is often termed 'combat,' that is, military/police-style armed conflict with multiple opponents. There's nothing wrong with this on paper -- after all, the guys who wrote the Constitution intended for citizens to have the capacity to self-organize to resist invasion and other assaults. In practice, though, this way of thinking creates a strong market for weapons and accessories that are scary-looking, expensive, and often wielded by folks who couldn't hit the side a whale if they were Jonah. In turn, when these weapons appear in the media, especially when in the hands of unstable crazies who use them in terminal games of 'Lazer Tag,' their appearance and the terms used to describe them ("semi-automatic," "high-capacity," "picatinny") are used to demonize not only those weapons in particular, but privately-owned firearms in general.
Of course, very few crimes are committed with 'combat firearms' as we're considering them here. Most gun murders and suicides are done with garden-variety civilian handguns, rifles, and shotguns. You don't generally see scruffballs with pantyhose over their heads sticking up a 7-11 with a $2000 customized AR-15 or a Class III machine gun. The bottom line is that you don't need a lot of bullets or fancy accessories to do a crime, and if you're desperate enough to commit one, you probably don't have a lot of cash to spare on Aimpoint dot sights, folding stocks, and drum magazines. But on those occasions when a "Call of Duty II"-enthusiast-cum-combat-firearms-collector does take a break from 'fragging' his buddies to rampage through his workplace, a mall, or sporting event, it's a PR disaster for responsible citizens.
Unlike the late, great-but-wrong-on-this-one Bill Ruger, I think it's a very bad idea to prohibit the sale of any firearms, including 'high-capacity' models and other scary-looking heaters. I do think, however, that all shooters should resist the temptation to start gearing up for the Tribulation as soon as they're old enough to buy a handgun. Face it : if you don't spend the time and money to master the fundamentals of shooting, all the 'night vision monoculars,' 'low-glare tactical finishes,' and extended magazines in the world aren't going to help you when you're faced with the sort of situation you think you're preparing for. Like the roly-poly Internet commando shown in Bill's post, most 'combat weapons' collectors are preparing not for a real-world confrontation, but for the bull session at the upcoming gun show or nutter conference.
Notwithstanding Mark Twain's just view of statistics, some oft-cited ones bear repetition here. The plain fact is that most firefights, the events for which combat firearms guys putatively plan against in dreadful preparation and secretly hope for, are engaged at 7 yards or fewer and involve the exchange of 3 or fewer shots. The old timers like Jeff Cooper, Skeeter Skelton, and Elmer Keith knew this, and they advocated accordingly for defensive weapons able to engage any target, through cover or not, and 'end the fight' with a minimum of fuss. They knew that they didn't need, in the words of firearms expert Nate Dogg, sixteen in the clip and one in the hole. They needed to solve bad problems with as few well-considered shots as possible to minimize the danger of good folks getting hurt.
Cooper, Keith, and Skelton also knew the value of constant disciplined practice. When you're busy on Internet chat boards reading the latest dish on SOCOM-inspired tactical slings and other fanciful accessories, it's hard to get a lot of range time in.
A fair amount of activity in the 'combat firearms' world is the result of a strange and noxious combination of fear and fantasy. For example, I knew a guy who had a powerful fear of illegal immigrants from Mexico and who accumulated 'combat firearms' in anticipation of one day engaging multiple Mexican targets in a vigilante situation, like some kind of racist 'Cobra.' Fortunately for us, this guy never got his chance to ‘liquidate’ a roomful of immigrant criminals. Guys like this are poison for PR.
The nut here is that the wise gun owner will recognize the power of public perception and what it means for the security of his rights. The wise gun owner will realize that he (or she!) is not on the SWAT team and resist buying equipment intended for such applications, at least until they can shoot a decent group. And, if compelled by fear to obtain military – style weapons, the gun owner should get some real training in how to use them from the scary-but-serious guys at Gunsite, Thunder Ranch, or a similar institution. A ‘tactical’ rig in the possession of a responsible and well-trained shooter is a reasonable if fearful hedge against unforeseeable aggression by multiple assailants. In the hands of the Internet hobbyist / loser hatefreak, it’s a deadly ‘NES Zapper’ that will be used as an exhibit against gun ownership by those who seek to abridge liberty. (572,568)
Perhaps you've been in a message forum where the topic 'Gun X iz teh best ever!!!11!!!1' has popped up or simply been talking to the local meathead who is a member of The Cult of Gun X, the conversation will claim that Gun X will bring peace on earth and good will toward men or claim that Gun Y will explode in your hand causing total protonic reversal. Chances are you are talking to a Gun Snob or dealing with Gun Snobbery. This bias is harmful both to any hopes of rational discussion, and to the shooting community in general. It is my intention to talk about what is said and my version of the truth.
Gun Snob Truths
These are statements and sentiments commonly made by Gun Snobs, and a closer examination by yours truly:
"You get what you paid for." - I am willing to sell my bowel movements for $10,000 a plop, that means you will be getting $10,000 worth of feces. Think about it. This statement is made by people who keep telling themselves that they dropped a whole lot of money on a firearm and has to constantly justify the purchase to themselves.
"This gun is great see the pics." - While a firearm may or may not have aesthetic virtue (which is in itself entirely subjective) unless the firearm is meant solely for show or to be shown off how a firearm looks only matters to owner pride. This snob is saying "Ooo pretty pretty nickle finish with ivory grips and gold highlights, it goes great with my sequin vest and pimp cane."
"Gun Y is inferior as it failed here." - There are pictures and anecdotes of just about every firearm that had one failure or another, a somewhat common one being the Kaboom:
Usually this has to do with faulty ammunition loadings. Plus there are seldom any pictures or anecdotes of the thousands of times this has not happened. It should be noted that maintenance also plays a big role in weapon failure and the lack there of. Often maintenance makes the difference between a well functioning piece and a weapon that jams every other round. Every major firearms manufacturer has had a recall.
Random model advice. - Often said by the "you get what you paid for" meathead. Though sometimes useful, often meatheads will give you advice on firearms they have never tried or repeat advice given by people who have never tried the firearm. You may notice that the 'Uber Gun' they are suggesting you buy is one that they own or are trying to sell you.
The Caliber Jihad
Any person who has had any lengthy conversation about firearms has run into The Caliber Jihad, a long quasi-religious battle where caliber zealots scream heresy in an attempt to anoint their chosen round as best. This topic is more littered with manure than a feedlot, and frankly I don't feel like getting the hip waders on. But as everyone has an opinion I'll toss in my dos pesos:
Only shots that hit count.
Shit happens, especially in a shitty situation.
Where a shot hits is more often than not more important than what hits.
If you can't get a tight grouping at a modest range in practice, you have absolutely no business discussing caliber.
The Uber Gun Myth
The crux of my rant. Contrary to popular opinion there is no 'uber gun.' There are a plethora of makes and models that are accurate and dependable, the choice between them is every bit as subjective and personal as your choice in undergarments. Shoot what you like, and try before you buy. Imagine the fat sweaty Gun Shop Guy or Keyboard Commando feeding you information telling you what underwear you should be wearing. (Though I'm sure the topic has come up in some survivalist forum, and there are people who love sniffing the skid marks of others.)
Closing
What is important is to ask yourself 'does this firearm meet my needs and do I like shooting it.' And more importantly don't make comments about firearms you have no experience on. That is not to say that there are not makes and models that are universally bad, but these tend to be well acknowledged from a variety of sources, but most criticism short of a recall notice or a class action suit should be treated with some degree of skepticism.
Watch out for gun snobbery, there is a great deal of flat out exaggeration about positive and negative attributes about various makes and models. Use multiple sources in making a selection not just fans and detractors. Keep in mind no advice is as important as your own experience and your ability to utilize your chosen firearm.
Oh yeah, HKs suck.
_________
_____
Actually HK makes excellent products, but I have serious problems with their attitudes towards small distributors and civilian customers. (42,242)
Share
